Steve Leimberg's Employee Benefits and Retirement Planning Email Newsletter - Archive Message #420

Date:

09-May-07

From:

Steve Leimberg's Employee Benefits and Retirement Planning Newsletter

Subject:

409A Regulations Impact on Grandfathered Split Dollar Arrangements (SDA's)

 

 

Lee J. Slavutin of Stern Slavutin 2, Inc. in New York City is  the author of the just revised "PPC's Guide to Life Insurance Strategies," http://www.thomson.com (800) 323-8724 or 817 332 3709). 

 

Charlie Ratner and Larry Brody gave LISI members a great summary of how 409A impacts on split-dollar agreements in Employee Benefits and Retirement Planning Newsletter # 417.

 

Lee focuses here on grandfathered split-dollar agreements.  If you represent a public company, take special note the

 

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:

 

IRS Notice 2007-34 provides guidance on the effect of the recently passed deferred compensation regulations (409A) on split dollar arrangements (SDA's). Most of our clients have SDA's established before the split dollar regulations (i.e., on or before September 17, 2003). Section III.D of the notice addresses such grandfathered SDA's (here, "grandfathered" refers to the split dollar regulations, not 409A). Most of the commentary to date has not addressed the precise impact of 409A on such plans. 

Most grandfathered SDA's are equity collateral assignment plans where the policy is owned by the employee or a trust for the employee's benefit. The policy is assigned to the employer as collateral for the premium payments and the employer is entitled to the lesser of (a) the cumulative premiums paid or (b) the cash value. The employee or trust will receive the excess, if any, of the cash value over the premiums paid, so called "equity."

 

FACTS:

 

Here is what the Notice, in section III.D, tells us about these grandfathered SDA's:

 

1.     A split-dollar life insurance arrangement provides for deferred compensation for purposes of section 409A if, the service provider, i.e., employee, has a legally binding right to compensation payable in a later year (for example, upon termination of the split-dollar arrangement).

2.      

3.     Most practitioners would agree that on termination of an equity collateral assignment SDA, the equity becomes taxable income to the employee (and a taxable gift to the trust, if trust owned).

4.      

5.     Therefore, an equity collateral assignment SDA that is expected to terminate, for example, at retirement age 65, provides deferred compensation and is covered by 409A.

6.      

7.     You might say "So what?" The income is taxable and 409A doesn't change that. "Yes" and "No" are both correct responses. 409A doesn't change the existence of deferred income at termination of the SDA.  But it now REQUIRES the SDA to conform to all the new rules regarding distributions, time and form of payments, definition of separation from service, deferral elections, anti-acceleration provisions, etc. of the 409A regulations.

 

KEY EMPLOYEE OF PUBLIC COMPANY?

8.      

9.     For example, a SDA covering a key employee of a public company must provide for a 6 month delay of any distribution of deferred compensation after separation from service. There are significant adverse tax consequences if the new 409A requirements are not met . immediate recognition of income, interest charges and a 20% penalty.

 

Under IRS Notice 2002-8, the IRS will not treat the SDA as having been terminated for so long as the parties to the arrangement continue to treat and report the value of the life insurance protection as an economic benefit. In such cases, provided that all other requirements of Notice 2002-8 are satisfied, the IRS will not assert that there has been a transfer of property to the benefited person by reason of termination of the arrangement for purposes of section 409A.

 

What does this mean? In our example of an equity collateral assignment SDA, the IRS appears to be saying the equity is not taxable income DURING the course of the SDA as long as Table 2001 costs (or other acceptable term charges) are reported annually as income or paid by the employee, and that 409A will not treat the growing equity as deferred compensation before the SDA terminates. Basically, GOOD NEWS.


 

For split-dollar life insurance arrangements entered into before September 18, 2003, the arrangement may be eligible to treat premium payments as loans. Such arrangements generally will not give rise to deferrals of compensation. 

 

However, an arrangement may give rise to deferrals of compensation if all or a portion of the payments on the loans are waived, cancelled, or forgiven. Again, the forgiveness of debt income at termination of a SDA is not changed by 409A. But the SDA is now covered by 409A because there is a deferral of compensation. As described above, the SDA must meet all the new definitions and requirements of the 409A regulations.



COMMENT:

 

So what is the message?

 

1.     We need to look at the split dollar agreements of our clients, with the help of lawyer who knows the new 409A rules. We need to do this well before the end of this year in case any amendments are necessary (deadline is 12/31/07).

2.      

3.     Is there is a deferral of compensation under 409A for any of the reasons described in the Notice?

4.      

5.     If there is deferred compensation under the SDA, does the SDA meet the new requirements of 409A (distribution restrictions, anti-acceleration rules, deferral election restrictions)?

6.      

7.     Best news is saved for last. The SOLUTION is easily available.

8.      

9.     We can amend the SDA and preserve the split dollar grandfathering, i.e., the Notice tells us that such amendments will NOT be material modifications for purposes of the split dollar regulations.

 

HOPE THIS HELPS YOU HELP OTHERS MAKE A POSITIVE DIFFERENCE!

 

Lee Slavutin

Edited by Steve Leimberg

 

CITE AS:

 

Steve Leimberg's Employee Benefits and Retirement Planning Newsletter # 420 (May 9, 2007) at http://www.leimbergservices.com

 

Copyright 2007 Leimberg Information Services, Inc. (LISI). Reproduction in Any Form or Forwarding to Any Person Prohibited - Without Express Permission.

 

CITES:

 

IRS Notice 2007-34